Best Byte

x

PRJCT WRKS

PRJCT WRKS

By blending creativity with execution, PRJCT WRKS transforms spaces into meaningful experiences for some of the world’s most recognized brands. As a design-and-build partner, they bring together architects, designers, builders, and project managers to deliver interiors that capture a brand’s identity while meeting the highest standards of functionality and quality. Founded in Amsterdam with over two decades of expertise, PRJCT WRKS has grown into a trusted partner for global names like Daily Paper, New Balance, Intertex and Emma Sleep. Their strength lies in handling the full lifecycle of a project, from the first sketch to the final fit-out, ensuring seamless coordination across multiple disciplines.

Intro

Manual Workflow Reduction

Data-Driven

Digital Transformation

Cost Reduction

CRM

Reporting & Analytics

SaaS

From Requirements to Real Options

The Challenge

PRJCT WRKS has built a strong reputation for delivering high-profile projects with creativity and precision. But as their portfolio expanded, so did the complexity of managing it all. Day-to-day operations were increasingly bogged down by manual tasks, heavy reliance on spreadsheets, and time-consuming workflows. To keep pace with their growing project load, they needed a more streamlined, connected way of working, one that could give them live visibility into project health, team capacity, and cash flow. With so many software solutions available, the challenge was finding the right system to support their unique design-and-build model. That’s where Best Byte came in: to provide clarity, structure, and a proven approach to identifying the best-fit solution.

The Approach

Best Byte guided PRJCT WRKS through our five-step process, from early discovery to vendor engagement but where the difference was made was in the Exploration phase. We didn’t just hand them a list of tools. We worked alongside their team to:

  • Translate their growing project demands into a clear, prioritized requirements set.

  • Research and compile a longlist of potential platforms from a crowded market of hundreds of options.

  • Engage directly with vendors, matching capabilities to PRJCT WRKS’s needs and filtering out the noise.

  • Apply weighted scoring to create a transparent shortlist of the strongest contenders.

This structured, hands-on approach meant PRJCT WRKS could focus their time on evaluating only the solutions that stood the best chance of suiting their needs, helping them move forward with clarity and confidence instead of being frustrated by endless vendor pitches or trial-and-error searching.

The Result

By investing in a structured Exploration phase, PRJCT WRKS achieved meaningful results:

  • Reduced a crowded market of 300+ project management tools down to a shortlist of 3 best-fit solutions.

  • Turned a complex set of business needs into a clear, prioritized requirements framework.

  • Created vendor scorecards using weighted scoring, enabling transparent comparisons across functionality, scalability, and cost.

  • Aligned leadership and project teams around a single vision of what the future system should deliver.

Beyond the numbers, PRJCT WRKS gained clarity, confidence, and the ability to focus only on vendors that could truly support their growing project load — setting them up for a successful evaluation and implementation phase without wasting months on trial and error.

The Takeaway

By investing in a structured Exploration phase, PRJCT WRKS achieved meaningful results:

  • Reduced a crowded market of 300+ project management tools down to a shortlist of 3 best-fit solutions.

  • Turned a complex set of business needs into a clear, prioritized requirements framework.

  • Created vendor scorecards using weighted scoring, enabling transparent comparisons across functionality, scalability, and cost.

  • Aligned leadership and project teams around a single vision of what the future system should deliver.

Beyond the numbers, PRJCT WRKS gained clarity, confidence, and the ability to focus only on vendors that could truly support their growing project load — setting them up for a successful evaluation and implementation phase without wasting months on trial and error.